Pardon me, but it isn't up to you to decide whom the Parliamentary committees hear. It's not up to you to decide whether parliamentarians aren't entitled to hear the person who made that poor decision.
In your last appearance, you claimed in your opening remarks that you were concerned about the fact that the parliamentary power of a committee could be used to compel the appearance of employees who make journalistic decisions every day.
How was the decision to have a podcast translated in France rather than in Quebec journalistic?