Mr. Christopherson, we're probably not going to develop a protocol here today. But in fairness to the witness, and I've been listening very carefully to the questions and the answers, the witness did say that the deputy minister, under the new regime, will have the final say.
You're going back to the firearms problem. That case was a specific example where the deputy minister, who in that case was Mr. Baker, for some reason didn't feel he had the final say and that his final say—his role and duty—was usurped by another deputy minister who decided to get a legal opinion. It became a very convoluted kind of situation.
But in fairness to the dialogue here today, I honestly think we're accomplishing much. That's my own view.