Very good, sir.
I'm also concerned that by focusing on the trees we're going to miss the forest a little bit. I want to come back to the decision on supplementary estimates.
Of the expenditures for the Firearms Centre between 1995-96 and 2002-03, 70%, or a total of $525 million, was sought by supplementary estimates. Why look for a legal opinion at this point when there's an established practice? There had been no problem about seeking supplementary estimates prior to that, so why the change?