No. I can give you a very clear answer on that.
The genesis of the legal opinion was, as indicated earlier, when as the Commissioner of Firearms I raised the issue as indicated in the Auditor General's report. Questions were raised in the Department of Public Safety, in particular, about what was the exact amount that we were questioning. Everyone was aware of the complexities of this contract. As alluded to, there were delay costs, there were unanticipated development costs. In providing that information, it was clear that we didn't really have a good handle on what belonged where, year-over-year charges, what was in the contract, what was not in the contract. On that basis, it was decided to seek a legal opinion from a senior lawyer in the justice department. That was a very important piece of the puzzle in determining the right way forward.