I think it would be a mistake to do that, to be honest with you, sir. I think we should look somewhere else.
The reason we insisted so much over time on getting this investment was because the assets were in dire need of being improved and significantly modernized. There is no question that although we may have good marketing, good products, good sales people and all, if we can't haul our trains and the locomotives fail all over the place, it's not going to work. If passengers get on cars that are used, that are old, that are dirty, with the carpets that are used and so forth, and if stations are not properly heated and so forth, it simply can't work. It's not sustainable.
My previous answer to your colleague was simply to say that what we've already flagged to the board as a revenue base has been significantly impacted by the recession. Our cost base is such that it requires now that we pay attention to it. We will raise this issue and ask if there is a way we can perhaps amend our mandate to better reflect the market conditions and better reflect our capabilities to meet the market demand. And in that regard I would strongly object--well, make a point of objection--to stopping the investment program. I don't think that would be the right thing to do.