My questions are surrounding the liability in contaminated sites, and they're mainly around the assumptions that have been made with regard to the debt. You previously stated that the ongoing liability is estimated for the future at around $5.8 billion, of which $3.5 billion is attributed to the four major sites. We don't need to get into whether or not we should have ever acquired those sites as a government, because ultimately, number one, it's in the past; number two, we probably didn't have any reasonable alternative.
I need a little bit of context around those assumptions: what term the $5.8 billion is assumed as having, and what's included in it. I'm looking at this. You've basically said there are 2,400 sites in total that have been evaluated at some level, and there are 6,200 sites that haven't been evaluated basically at all.
This is just my own personal thought. If I were to say that $3.5 billion is attributed to the four major sites, that would leave $2.3 billion to be distributed over the other 2,400; is that correct?