I will answer the question backwards in the sense that we hear from subcontractors specifically within our office about issues they're experiencing with the prime contractor. They're looking for our services in hopes that we can help them. Unfortunately we cannot. We have limitations similar to those of the OAG.
That being said—and again, I didn't make this recommendation—by listening to much of the testimony here and before the OGGO committee, I see there is a need for more transparency associated with monies from the federal purse that flow down to subcontractors. I understand there are obviously privity-of-contract issues associated with information shared between the primes and subcontractors and sub-subcontractors, but I think when you're involved in federal government contracting, there is an obligation of transparency.
While I couldn't make that recommendation because it wasn't appropriate given the parties subjected to this review, it's certainly an issue that I think warrants a significant analysis to see whether it's possible. I think it would help address some of the issues that we're seeing.