Okay.
As we go through this process, we are finding out more, based on your report, about what happened, when it happened and where. There remains a gap as to why. Why were documents either not created or destroyed? Why were processes rigged? Why was there such a desire within government to fit the square peg of GC Strategies into this round hole for an IT project that they had no expertise on? Do you have any reflections, based on the work you did, about why the government proceeded in this fashion?
I'd be curious to hear from both Mr. Jeglic and the Auditor General's office.