Thank you very much.
Again, I welcome the meetings that we are having on this topic. It's a very important topic. It's all about finding out what happened and how the public service can do better as we go forward.
I am not happy about prescriptive directions to the public service about what should or should not be done, certainly not prior to a fulsome study on the topic. That is why I and my colleagues voted against the previous motion that was sprung on us without prior discussion, without looking for a way—which we have done in the past—to frame a motion that does not normally fall into this committee's remit, that is not normally in our mandate. However, we have found ways, working with all the parties, to put together a motion that would, indeed, represent the wishes of all members of this committee, because this is a committee that works, normally, on a consensual basis. It is very disappointing to see it being instrumentalized, used and weaponized by certain members for their own, I guess, social media purposes.
On that note, my concern is with producing a list of people without any context, and I would like to hear Mr. Huppé and the Auditor General on what they think of this motion.
Thank you.