My capacity to investigate him is based on me being able to have reasonable grounds to believe.
The mere fact that his name was mentioned in an email on September 8 and nothing else—it was “Randy”; it didn't even say Boissonnault—is not enough to launch an investigation to constitute reasonable grounds to believe that something is wrong.
Now we have two more days and suddenly seven times the name Randy was used. I want to know, first of all from him, what were his communications, if any, on those two days. Once I have that, I will have to decide whether I have reasonable grounds to believe that an investigation is warranted.