We heard some pretty disturbing testimony yesterday. I really don't want to side with the witnesses, but they named a deputy minister who would have been better off if only one version of the ArriveCAN story had been told and if the whole thing had blown over. Perhaps the public sector integrity commissioner should be looking into this, but is it a conflict of interest or a lack of professional integrity? It might fall somewhere in between the two.
Who deals with ethics or conflict of interest among public servants who are not appointed or elected?