Here's what I'm doing: I'm proposing a subamendment to replace the RCMP commissioner on that list with the law clerk. It seems like the mover of this amendment is actually looking for the law clerk. They're looking for someone who can answer questions about the appropriateness of that June motion and about some of the procedural or constitutional issues associated with that request for documents. In the abstract, the RCMP commissioner may have an opinion on this, but if this is a question of constitutional or legal authority, the appropriateness of sending for these documents and the discretion that's available to the House.... I mean, it was a decision of the House and not of this committee, and I should underline that, but it does relate to work that this committee is doing. If members want to probe that issue, I think we can talk about it.
I would propose the subamendment that we replace the RCMP commissioner with the law clerk on this list.