I think it's a joint onus. The provinces have signed on to a funding agreement and have agreed that they would make regular reporting, but then the onus is also on the federal government to make sure that reporting is comprehensive and accurate.
For example, we saw good controls. Funding was withheld or the next tranche of funding was withheld when reports hadn't been received. Once they were received, the money then flowed to the provinces.
What was concerning was the content of that. For example, in one case, it talked about child care spaces for individuals age six and over, when this was supposed to fund five and under. It's just some of that accuracy. That onus is on the federal government, to make sure that the money is being used as intended.
