I'd like to reiterate what Mr. Hill just said. In attempting to make Mr. Holland's amendment fit, we would be in a dangerous predicament to try to amend this on the fly and come up with wording we sort of agree with but then on further reflection find there are issues with it.
With all due respect, we should move on. We've dealt with Mr. Holland's amendment, and from the perspective of the government and the officials, we were opposed to that amendment. If we try to now come up with something that will do what Mr. Holland wanted in a back-door way, we'll just end up with a bit of a mess in the legislation.