In fact, it's Mr. Davies' amendment that makes no sense. If we say “the offender's return to Canada after the transfer”, it's obvious that he will be scot-free and no one will be the wiser. I think we should leave it the way it is.
February 3rd, 2011 / 10:35 a.m.
Liberal
Alexandra Mendes Liberal Brossard—La Prairie, QC
In fact, it's Mr. Davies' amendment that makes no sense. If we say “the offender's return to Canada after the transfer”, it's obvious that he will be scot-free and no one will be the wiser. I think we should leave it the way it is.
See context to find out what was said next.