There are a number of issues there that I'd like to address.
First, when it comes to the duty to warn, it's very important to note—and the RCMP confirmed this when they were cross-examined during the foreign interference commission as well—that the RCMP will go to a number of individuals within the community. I believe it's been publicly reported that there have been over a dozen individuals who have been warned of an imminent threat to their life without being provided any information about where that threat is emanating from and without any resources or support to actually confront that.
When you're looking at a political activist being targeted by a foreign country because of their political opinion and their community leadership, and the RCMP is showing them a slip of paper saying that they're being targeted by another country and their life is at risk, what they're then essentially provided with is the option to disengage from public life and stop exercising their charter rights to engage in political expression and political activism, or continue to engage in public life and face a risk to their life.
When it was put to the RCMP, I believe the commissioner's response, and I'm paraphrasing, was roughly something to the effect that it's the individual's choice. I think the entire system, particularly with the threats that we're seeing from India, and the government's response, the lack of resources or supports, is shocking to most Canadians. It is very concerning and something that needs to be acted upon.