I find myself in a particularly interesting and perplexing situation here where I think we should do six meetings. Look, I think this is a very important topic and discussion. I am fully in support of the motion, as I said. The rationale for proposing two is that I suspect we're going to have an extremely busy fall, given that there are a number of new things that this committee is going to have the opportunity to discuss, particularly around artificial intelligence, digital transformation, digital innovation, things that are going to be coming its way. My thinking, when I made the suggestion, was that we would be able to address this important matter, given that we have had lots of discussions about it, and then ensure that there is sufficient time for other things.
What I would hate to see is for this study to, yet again, get hung up because there's something else that's important; then another motion comes up and the work never gets done on this. If the will of the committee is to do four, who the heck am I to argue? I just don't want us to see this thing end up hanging, because there's something urgent that replaces the important. That's all.