I'll answer in terms of what we have heard. We have heard from port authorities, but we have heard also from other marine interests in terms of the fact that various projects related to the marine sector and related to port operations or installations are maybe not advanced as rapidly or not as viably in terms of partnership arrangements because of the lack of available funds for capital infrastructure.
As I've said, we've also had the benefit of consultations over a couple of years. Since the time that the review panel recommended access to federal funding for capital infrastructure projects, obviously environmental sustainability issues have also come to the forefront. We've also had the experience with the security funding program that has been in place. We addressed all that as part of a coherent and cohesive package relating to the areas that would be targeted for infrastructure funding.
So we have heard from the ports and we have heard from interested parties in the marine sector. Have they given us specific projects? In some instances, they've outlined some projects related—I'll use the term “short-sea shipping” again—that could potentially be realizable with investments from various parties. It's not just from the federal government. It could be from private parties as well that would come to play, or it could be as well from other levels of government that would be eligible for various funding.