I know that a lot of our comments have focused on CATSA, but I think the review would have to look at the screening process in totality. So it would have to involve Transport Canada and the screening philosophy and approach that's used and how that then gets delivered through CATSA, or a revised model of CATSA, or whatever it happens to be. I don't know where that would be, but I think it would be very good to look at what we are screening for, what we are trying to achieve with passengers, with their carry-on baggage, with their checked baggage, and decide whether the cargo screening even gets put on the table for that.
I think that sort of philosophical review has to happen and then drive looking at the way that CATSA is set up and organized and where the resources and the money are being invested in delivering the services, and do we need to reallocate? Can we possibly cut in some areas to bolster other areas? Are there some areas that really need enhancement and others that we can do away with completely?
We have questions, but we don't have a lot of answers about how CATSA spends their administrative money, because there's not a lot of transparency for the carriers as to what's happening within there. We see hints and glimmers, but the true facts we don't know.
So instead of just focusing on CATSA, I think we should be looking at what is the philosophy, how are we going to do that, and then how do we best allocate the resources that are available?