Just to go further, this isn't necessarily a motion that I've seen before in other committees. It's not necessarily a bad thing that we haven't seen it before in other committees, and it doesn't necessarily make it valid. I think if we are going to have this motion, item d) should remain in it. I guess I'm questioning the necessity for the motion. Especially with the government in the minority, there's very little that would cause us to worry that the members of the governing party might be trying to silence a particular debate.
I guess I would be opposed to an amendment to the motion as a whole. I'm questioning the necessity for the motion in its entirety. In my experience, even when we held a majority, there was a lack of a desire to push things into an in camera debate, and the idea that the committee was a good arbiter of what that was at any given time… That's just from my experience, and I'm putting it out there.
I'd like to hear from the other opposition parties and their thoughts on it. If they want it, I'm not going to move to amend it any further, but I guess I question the rationale for it.