I have just a couple of key points on what's been said here.
For me, the amendment is put forward because it's the responsible thing to do in terms of the analysis of witness testimony and not presupposing those recommendations. It's not who's more Canadian or who's more focused. We all want to work. We want to see work completed by Canadians. We want work done by Canadians, but we also don't want to presuppose anything that may not be beneficial to the country writ large or this example.
I just wanted to put that in there. From a process perspective, it's to get the best recommendations. It's to go through the right process to get them and to do this strategically. It's not to avoid anything. It's not to remove anything. There is no grand conspiracy here. We want to get to the heart of the matter, but we want to do it the right way and with the right process. I think that's what all parliamentarians share.
I just wanted to put that on the record. Thank you.