Usually, an impartial report should contain arguments on both sides. I have seen other reports. This report only looks at the cons.
There is something ironic. In his testimony, Dr. Pierre Morisset himself said that there are contradictory reports. That's great. Why are there no contradictory reports in the file? There is a paradox. Why does the file suggest that they hold the truth? The doctor himself said that there are contradictions. Why aren't they in the report?