House of Commons Hansard #225 of the 41st Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was scientists.
Reduction of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Regulations First reading of Bill C-484. .
Opposition Motion--Science 14600 words, 2 hours.
Supplementary Estimates (C), 2012-2013 First reading of Bill C-58. 300 words, 10 minutes.
Interim Supply 500 words, 10 minutes.
Interim Supply First reading of Bill C-59. 400 words.
Anne Minh-Thu Quach NDP Beauharnois—Salaberry, QC
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague from Rivière-des-Mille-Îles for that very relevant question.
If the Conservatives wanted to help the commander, they should reinvest in science and make informed decisions so that they do not abandon our scientists.
Hélène LeBlanc NDP LaSalle—Émard, QC
Mr. Speaker, I would like to share with you my experience as it pertains to this matter.
In 2004, I went back to school to complete a BA in the pure sciences. It was a wonderful experience to submit to the rigour of scientific inquiry. My studies in agricultural and environmental sciences were a wonderful experience because of the team work and the quest for answers to our questions. It is interesting to note that when we asked a question or formulated a hypothesis, other questions surfaced. That is what science is all about.
Knowledge is rooted in science. When we engage in scientific inquiry or conduct experiments, we are searching for science. These studies allowed me to look at the world in a different way and to take another look at the universe, whether it was an infinitely small universe or an infinitely immense universe, in microbiology or in physics. These studies provide the opportunity to see the world in a different light.
The 2011 election gave me the opportunity to become an MP and sit in Parliament. In my opinion, Parliament is a place for debate where we ask ourselves questions and look for the best solutions to the important issues brought before us. Parliament Hill and the public service employees who serve Canadians exist to help parliamentarians find the answers they need so that the laws introduced in the House of Commons are based on facts, evidence and probative data from Statistics Canada or scientific research.
Public research is interesting. As my colleague said earlier, research and development is carried out by universities and industries, and also by the government. That is called public research. In Canada, for a number of decades, we have been interested in various subjects. We are a Nordic country, with a particular climate. Thus, we are interested in meteorological data. In fact, Canada began establishing meteorological stations in the mid-1800s and even earlier.
These data have been collected over the years and allow us to see daily weather trends. Meteorological data allow us to see if it is time for farmers to plant or, later in the year, to harvest, or if we should be wearing a winter coat or a raincoat. When these meteorological data are collected over a number of years, they also reveal climate trends.
It is the same for environmental data. Environmental monitoring must take place over a number of years.
The beauty of public scientific research is that it provides the data needed to track trends. That is what the Experimental Lakes Area did. Since 1968, when this program was established, the region has served as a living laboratory to answer our questions about, say, lakes that were dead. What was the cause? What would fix the problem? The ELA allowed us—and will allow us, if the government wakes up and realizes the need to continue—to collect essential data. It is very important for us as parliamentarians and Canadians.
I would also like to point out that while I was in Vancouver, I was one of the only parliamentarians who attended the American Association for the Advancement of Science conference. I had the opportunity to meet with science professionals who denounced the muzzling of scientists, which we have already talked about. I spoke about my studies and the importance of being able to debate issues and how to address them.
Then, last spring, I participated in a protest against muzzling scientists. It was very exciting to see a number of scientists rise up during the protest to denounce this.
Opposition Motion--ScienceBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin
It being 6:15 p.m., and today being the last allotted day for the supply period ending March 26, 2013, it is my duty to interrupt the proceedings and put forthwith every question necessary to dispose of the business of supply.
The question is on the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Opposition Motion--ScienceBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
Opposition Motion--ScienceBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders
Opposition Motion--ScienceBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders
Opposition Motion--ScienceBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin
In my opinion the nays have it.
And five or more members having risen:
Call in the members.
Business of SupplyGovernment Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Canada Revenue AgencySupplementary Estimates (C), 2012-2013Government Orders
Parry Sound—Muskoka Ontario
Conservative
Tony Clement ConservativePresident of the Treasury Board
moved:
That Vote 1c, in the amount of $1, under CANADA REVENUE AGENCY—Canada Revenue Agency—Operating expenditures and contributions, in the Supplementary Estimates (C) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2013, be concurred in.
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Canada Revenue AgencySupplementary Estimates (C), 2012-2013Government Orders
Conservative
Gordon O'Connor Conservative Carleton—Mississippi Mills, ON
Mr. Speaker, if you seek it, I believe you will find agreement to apply the results of the previous vote to the current vote with the Conservatives voting yes.
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Canada Revenue AgencySupplementary Estimates (C), 2012-2013Government Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Canada Revenue AgencySupplementary Estimates (C), 2012-2013Government Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Canada Revenue AgencySupplementary Estimates (C), 2012-2013Government Orders
NDP
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Canada Revenue AgencySupplementary Estimates (C), 2012-2013Government Orders
Liberal
Judy Foote Liberal Random—Burin—St. George's, NL
Mr. Speaker, the Liberals agree to apply the vote and will vote no.
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Canada Revenue AgencySupplementary Estimates (C), 2012-2013Government Orders
Bloc
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Canada Revenue AgencySupplementary Estimates (C), 2012-2013Government Orders
Independent
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Canada Revenue AgencySupplementary Estimates (C), 2012-2013Government Orders
Green
Concurrence in Vote 1c—Canada Revenue AgencySupplementary Estimates (C), 2012-2013Government Orders
Independent
Supplementary Estimates (C), 2012-2013Government Orders
Tony Clement Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON
moved:
That the Supplementary Estimates (C) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2013, except for any vote disposed of earlier today, be concurred in.
Supplementary Estimates (C), 2012-2013Government Orders
The Speaker Andrew Scheer
The question is on the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
