Mr. Speaker, my colleague mentioned in his speech that there was a court ruling from an Ontario court that precipitated this whole discussion, so I have a two-part question here.
First, why does he think the government did not appeal the decision? That seems like a strange decision from the government. Was it smart or not smart?
Second, there needs to be a substantial connection according to the court ruling, which makes a little bit of sense. Our suggestion would be to have maybe a better substantial connection than what the government has proposed.
