The House is on summer break, scheduled to return Sept. 15
House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was toronto.

Last in Parliament April 2025, as Independent MP for Spadina—Fort York (Ontario)

Won his last election, in 2021, with 39% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship December 2nd, 2024

Mr. Speaker, Canada's border and immigration are key issues for the incoming Trump administration. It is no surprise that the immigration minister was left out of the Prime Minister's Mar-a-Lago visit, given that it is his failures that have now placed our economy at risk.

With IRGC agents hiding behind the refugee program to avoid deportation, can the public safety minister, who did make the trip and whose department finally got around to designating the IRGC as the terrorist group it is, share what he is doing to kick out every single terrorist from Canada?

Public Safety November 27th, 2024

Mr. Speaker, in 2024, 358 people on the U.S. terrorism watch-list were stopped from crossing into the United States from Canada. How did these terrorists enter Canada in the first place? The immigration minister's failure to secure our borders puts Canadians in danger, and his incompetence has now placed Canada's economy at risk with a 25% Trump trade tariff.

Will the Prime Minister fire this incompetent minister before he does even more damage to Canada?

Privilege November 22nd, 2024

Mr. Speaker, I have a security clearance as a result of my role as a naval reserve officer. It is a very rigorous process to go through. There are requirements, for anyone who has clearance, when accessing certain information, and they include, to put it simply, muzzling the ability to use it.

The role of the official opposition, as the Liberals know full well, is to hold the government to account, but getting into the trap they are trying to set up for the leader of the official opposition to get a security clearance would prohibit him from doing his duty of holding the government to account. Let us instead focus on the fact that the Prime Minister does not need a security clearance to name the names. He, as the Prime Minister, has the ability to declassify all of that.

He was able to go to the Hogue inquiry and throw out there that he has, allegedly, seen some Conservative names. That is convenient. I thought we could not reveal anything because we need to protect intelligence and its methods, all of that. That does not seem to matter to the Liberals when it can be of potential partisan advantage to them to magically declassify things. It is just like what they alleged about India, only for the national security and intelligence adviser, last night, to completely walk that back, all at the expense of our country and our relationship with the largest democracy in the world.

Shame on the government.

Privilege November 22nd, 2024

Mr. Speaker, I hosted a press conference just a couple weeks ago where we brought in an investigative journalist who has been at the forefront of identifying foreign interference. We also brought in the former Asia Pacific desk chief at CSIS and brought in a sinologist. They are all experts in identifying Chinese foreign interference. At that press conference, names were named, and one of the names raised was that of the international trade minister. The minister sits on the side opposite with the member.

The Liberals raise the issue of foreign interference, but who is the one truly not taking it seriously? They bring up the Conservative leader, but he himself has said to name the names. I am paraphrasing, but essentially he said that he does not care which party they are in. That is because our democracy and the integrity of this place and our country go beyond partisanship.

That should matter more than whoever they are, because we need to root out these traitors. They are a cancer on our democracy. We need to remove them and shine a light into the shadows where foreign operatives hide.

Privilege November 22nd, 2024

Mr. Speaker, it is insane that the federal government has extended not only taxpayer dollars but charitable status to organizations that are fronts for the Chinese Communist Party. What is the incentive? What is the motivation? Is it because the government benefits in some way? As we heard at the Hogue inquiry, members of the Liberal caucus and their party benefited from help to secure nominations and fundraising.

What is the motivation? Why have the Liberals dragged their feet for as long as they have? What are they afraid of? Why are they scared to come out and name the 11 parliamentarians? They continue to focus on this issue of a security clearance, but we do not need a security clearance to know that 11 parliamentarians have been named. Not only was this found at the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians, but it was validated by the Hogue inquiry. It has been validated by multiple news report.

What we need to know is why the Prime Minister refuses to name those 11 members. What is he so afraid of?

Privilege November 22nd, 2024

Mr. Speaker, I hope this member gets a gold star from the Liberal Party for trying to deflect so obviously. I said this in my remarks, knowing that this was going to come up: One deflects from the core issue because one cannot defend the indefensible. That is why the Liberals deflect as much as they can. They try to make this big thing about the security clearance when it is the Prime Minister who is sitting on intelligence of 11 parliamentarians who have been noted as having betrayed this country. These 11 parliamentarians are in the protective custody of the Prime Minister. Why is that? What is he so afraid of?

Privilege November 22nd, 2024

Mr. Speaker, I thank my Conservative colleague for standing in solidarity with me and for the opportunity to elaborate a little bit more.

Like I said, I have been called worse by much better. People make personal attacks in this place because they cannot defend the indefensible. It is indefensible to try to protect a foreign national who boasts of foreign interference when the country is in the grips of trying to understand the full scope of foreign interference in this country. It is indefensible that citizenship was granted to an ISIS terrorist, and it is indefensible at a time when Canadians need to be healed and are hurting that doctors are being prevented from practising in our country and building a life here when we need them more than ever.

Those actions are indefensible, and what that minister did disgraced not only himself but also his office as a minister of the Crown. I think it was a disgrace to everyone in this place.

Privilege November 22nd, 2024

Mr. Speaker, we are debating an issue that goes to the core of our country and our democracy, which are built on the foundational pillars of transparency and accountability. I have been listening to this debate, and the Liberal responses have often been to deflect or to attack the messenger. We only go personal when we cannot defend something based on its merits, when we cannot defend the indefensible. Unfortunately, this seems to apply to multiple issues raised with the government.

Recently, I asked the Prime Minister a question related to Chinese foreign interference. Again, we heard a personal attack. Instead of focusing on the very important matter of foreign interference, he attacked me, and it was so blatantly and sadly transparent. In the latest example, we heard yet another pathetic personal attack from the immigration minister during question period earlier today.

I do not care about what he called me because I have been called worse by better, but I do take offence to the personal attacks that he has levied against my staff. My Toronto constituency office is proud to serve not only my constituents but also other Torontonians who have been failed by the immigration minister's Toronto Liberal colleagues. I could not be more proud of my team for stepping up where the government has failed. All four of my team members in Toronto are former immigrants, and one is a former refugee. Unlike the immigration minister, we actually care about immigrants, who are the people who choose to make Canada their home, who want to work or study here, or who want to visit, often because their families call Canada home and they want to reunite with them.

Far too many people have been failed by IRCC, the department under the immigration minister's watch. People have been caught in some sort of weird purgatory, which has been inhumane while they are separated from their family or missing funerals to say their final goodbye to loved ones. I do not know if it is because of incompetence, ignorance or something else that is driving the immigration minister.

Unlike the immigration minister, those in my office actually care about the integrity of Canada's legal and immigration systems and would never abuse our power to make a mockery of Canada's courts and the professional immigration staff by overruling a deportation order issued by our own department and upheld by the federal court to save a five-time criminally convicted foreign national who boasted of foreign financing to blockade Canadian roads and infrastructure, such as building pipelines. No wonder the government does not take the issue of foreign interference seriously when it is actively abetting it and saving those who are proudly boasting of it.

How can we have a country where there is transparency, responsibility and accountability when we are protecting foreign nationals who are boasting of foreign interference? Under the immigration minister's watch, and that of his predecessors, it is letting in ISIS terrorists, who are in videos dismembering the bodies of the victims they have murdered, and granting them citizenship.

I take the issue of immigration seriously because my parents were refugees who were welcomed to Canada at a time when other countries were closing their borders to people in need. I knew of no better way to honour that incredible act of compassion by Canada then, 40 years ago, than to serve. I volunteered to join the Navy nine and a half years ago because there is no better way than to give back and serve the very country that gave my family everything.

Last year, during my honeymoon, my wife very kindly allowed us to take a detour to South Africa so I could meet with Canada's High Commissioner in Pretoria, because there also is racism there. Racism is perpetuated by locally employed staff hired by the department of immigration. People are perpetuating the injustices of apartheid in Canada's name, and it continues under the watch of the immigration minister. Nothing is being done.

There are Black doctors and nurses from South Africa who want to come here and help heal Canadians to relieve the backlog of patients and surgeries, which are so bad in British Columbia that they have to send Canadian patients to the U.S. What a shame and what a sham. They are being discriminated against, and that continues under this immigration minister's watch.

This is why I have been so adamant in ensuring that we uphold the highest standards of Canada's legal and immigration systems. Again, this goes back to the heart of the issue that we have been debating in regards to SDTC because it is clear that, when we turn a blind eye to corruption, when we turn a blind eye to perhaps, at best, incompetence, we see what happens. We see how it permeates different departments in this country, and it is failing Canadians.

I will use my last few moments to simply address a matter that was also raised with the immigration minister, which was when he attacked the competence of my staff. He said that my office never sent his department anything.

Well, minister should go back to his office to ask his team about the case that was escalated on September 14, 2024. He should ask his office about another case that was escalated to him on October 23, 2024. He should also ask his office about a more recent one, sent just last week, on November 13, 2024, about the Australian doctor I referenced during question period. This Australian doctor of Iranian heritage left the evil regime because she did not want to live under the gender apartheid regime. She went to Australia, got trained and wanted to come to Canada to help heal, but now she is stuck in IRCC purgatory.

When the minister attacks the integrity and competence of my team, and he is pointing at us, he seems to forget that there are also fingers pointing back at him. He should ask his team: Did they intentionally keep it from him, or did they miss it?

Petitions November 22nd, 2024

Mr. Speaker, I have the privilege of presenting a petition signed by nearly 13,000 people demanding action on Samidoun. While the organization has been finally listed as the terrorist group that it is, the job is not finished. The petition specifically notes that under paragraph 83.05(1)(b) of the Criminal Code, it is illegal to knowingly act on behalf of, at the direction of or in association with a listed terrorist group. On October 15, the United States also designated Khaled Barakat a leadership member of the PFLP, a listed terrorist group, but the federal government continues to allow Khaled Barakat to remain in Canada. It is time for the federal government to finish the job and kick out of Canada the terrorist leader and all who support terrorism.

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship November 22nd, 2024

Mr. Speaker, the turmoil at IRCC continues. I have an Australian-trained doctor stuck in the department's quagmire. We have badly needed skilled tradespeople who want to come to Canada lost in the logjam, yet there are no delays in getting citizenship for ISIS terrorists who produce videos of victims being dismembered. It is the same with human traffickers when they need a court-banned passport replaced.

What are the twisted priorities of the immigration minister? Can he focus on letting people into our country who want to heal Canadians, not kill or traffic them, and build the homes instead of blowing them up?