House of Commons Hansard #23 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was c-2.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives extensively question the Liberal deficit and economic stewardship, citing the Parliamentary Budget Officer on a higher deficit, stagnant wages, and rising food inflation impacting the cost of living. They propose a "three strikes" law to counter soft-on-crime policies and criticize declining housing starts under unsustainable immigration.
The Liberals promote their upcoming investment budget to build the strongest G7 economy, citing a reduced interest rate as a sign their plan is working. They address housing affordability, public safety with stricter bail, and achieving sustainable immigration. The party also commits to improving CRA services and protecting Canadian seniors.
The Bloc champions Quebec's right to invoke the notwithstanding clause for state secularism and French language, criticizing irregular judicial appointments and defending French as an official language. They also offer tributes to Ken Dryden, John McCallum, and Gail Shea.
The NDP demands serious action regarding the Gaza genocide, urging Canada to stop weapon sales and impose sanctions. They also pay tribute to former parliamentarians: Ken Dryden's legacy of universal child care and children's rights, John McCallum's compassionate immigration efforts, and Gail Shea's devoted public service and community support.
The Greens paid tribute to former parliamentarians. Elizabeth May lauded Ken Dryden's efforts for universal child care, John McCallum's intellect and kindness and help with immigration, and Gail Shea's trailblazing political career and dedication to public service.

Criminal Code First reading of Bill C-220. The bill aims to remove immigration status as a factor in sentencing, seeking to end a two-tier practice where non-citizens allegedly receive more lenient sentences for serious crimes. 100 words.

Corrections and Conditional Release Act First reading of Bill C-221. The bill amends the Corrections and Conditional Release Act to provide victims of crime with timely, accurate information on offender sentencing, parole eligibility, movements within the prison system, and ensures their participation at parole hearings. 300 words.

Petitions

Strong Borders Act Second reading of Bill C-2. The bill strengthens the asylum system and secures Canada's borders by modernizing customs, expanding the Coast Guard's mandate, and combating fentanyl and money laundering. Opposition parties raise concerns about potential infringements on privacy and civil liberties, including mail opening without warrants and cash transaction limits. They also highlight the lack of bail and sentencing reform for violent crimes, while some question the bill's constitutionality. 24500 words, 3 hours.

Adjournment Debates

Canola tariffs imposed by China Jeremy Patzer asks why the government isn't addressing Chinese tariffs on Canadian canola. Sophie Chatel responds that the government is engaged, and that risk management programs are available. Patzer says that AgriStability does not trigger when needed. Chatel responds that the programs need to fit the need.
Canadian food prices Greg McLean raises concerns about rising food costs and criticizes the government's spending policies. Karim Bardeesy responds by outlining government initiatives to stabilize food prices, promote competition in the grocery sector, and provide targeted support to those in need. McLean insists that the Liberals "get ahead" of the food inflation they are causing.
International doctor licensing Dan Mazier asks how many of the 800 international doctors who were granted permanent residency last year are now licensed to practice medicine. Maggie Chi discusses the need to integrate internationally educated health professionals, but does not answer Mazier's specific question about licensing.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Natural ResourcesOral Questions

3:05 p.m.

Markham—Thornhill Ontario

Liberal

Tim Hodgson LiberalMinister of Energy and Natural Resources

Mr. Speaker, I have good news for everyone. This week, we are putting “one project, one review” into action. This week, British Columbia and the federal government jointly approved the new Ksi Lisims LNG export terminal, led by the Nisg̱a'a Nation, with a first nations-owned pipeline attached. That project will be the second-largest project in the history of the country. We have LNG Canada phase 1, Cedar LNG, Woodfibre LNG and Ksi Lisims LNG. We are building the strongest economy in the G7.

Forestry IndustryOral Questions

3:05 p.m.

Conservative

Gaétan Malette Conservative Kapuskasing—Timmins—Mushkegowuk, ON

Mr. Speaker, for more than 45 years, communities in northern Ontario have endured the devastating impact of U.S. tariffs on their forestry sector. In Kapuskasing, Kap Paper is a vital link for five sawmills, and if that link breaks, more will be challenged. That is thousands of jobs on the line.

While the federal government has committed to over $1.2 billion to support the industry, it has failed to follow through. When will it help the workers at Kap Paper?

Forestry IndustryOral Questions

3:05 p.m.

Markham—Thornhill Ontario

Liberal

Tim Hodgson LiberalMinister of Energy and Natural Resources

Mr. Speaker, I grew up in a logging town. I know exactly what the softwood lumber industry is going through. We allocated $1.2 billion in three different programs to the softwood lumber industry. We are helping retool the industry and rebuild the industry for the reality that is going on in the economy today. We will make the industry strong again.

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

3:05 p.m.

NDP

Alexandre Boulerice NDP Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, QC

Mr. Speaker, since Monday, there have been people on the Hill reading the names of the 18,000 children of Gaza who have been killed in the genocide that is unfolding right before our eyes. Some of these children were killed by a sniper on their way to pick up food. An entire week will not be enough time to read all of these names.

This tragedy requires serious action. It is time to stop the sale of weapons to the Netanyahu regime. Tough sanctions must be imposed. International law must be respected. The Liberals must act. The entire world is looking at us and our children will be asking us how we responded.

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

3:05 p.m.

Oakville East Ontario

Liberal

Anita Anand LiberalMinister of Foreign Affairs

Mr. Speaker, the situation that Palestinians are facing is intolerable. This matter is before the court and we will be closely following the situation as it develops.

Canada is putting pressure on all parties to agree to an immediate ceasefire. We will not wait to act. We have sanctioned extremist settlers, including ministers. We have provided $355 million in assistance and we also intend to recognize the state of Palestine next week.

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

3:05 p.m.

Bloc

Yves Perron Bloc Berthier—Maskinongé, QC

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order.

In response to a Conservative member, the Minister of Immigration said that she would answer her in English to be sure she was understood. I would just like to remind my colleagues, and perhaps the minister as well, that we are free to speak in the official language of our choice in the House, and perhaps that underestimated the very high quality of our interpreters' work. I would like that to be withdrawn.

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

3:05 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

That is duly noted.

The hon. member for Drummond.

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Bloc

Martin Champoux Bloc Drummond, QC

Mr. Speaker, I see that you were going to move on to the next item, but my colleague from Berthier—Maskinongé requested that the minister withdraw her remarks.

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Liberal

Steven MacKinnon Liberal Gatineau, QC

Mr. Speaker, I see no reason why the minister should apologize. She cited numbers that the member opposite did not understand, so she repeated them.

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB

Mr. Speaker, we are at a time when I think we need to bring some decorum to this place, and what the minister said undermined the seriousness of the debate. It made light of it, and to my Bloc colleague's point, she did not do her job as the minister, so I would like an apology too.

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Bloc

Jean-Denis Garon Bloc Mirabel, QC

Mr. Speaker, I understood from my colleague's previous intervention that she wanted an apology.

My colleague from Berthier—Maskinongé did not ask for an apology. He asked for a simple correction from the minister. Her comments were unbecoming of a minister and unworthy of the status of French as an official language in the House. I think that, in the Liberals' supposed spirit of co-operation, she should just withdraw her statement.

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

I understand that it is a matter of respect and decorum, but, in my opinion, it is an idiomatic expression, so to speak. I will leave it at that.

The member for Portneuf—Jacques‑Cartier.

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Conservative

Joël Godin Conservative Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, QC

Mr. Speaker, it is important to promote both official languages which, for everyone except the Liberals, are French and English.

I think the request from my Bloc colleague is justified, and I invite our colleague to simply withdraw her comments. That way, we can move on, and it will demonstrate that the Liberals respect both French and English.

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

Since the minister does not wish to respond, we will continue. We must be careful with the language we use. In this case, as I said, it is an idiomatic expression, even if it is not necessarily the most polite expression.

Hon. Ken DrydenOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

It being 3:13 p.m., pursuant to order made on Tuesday, September 16, 2025, I invite all hon. members to stand to observe a moment of silence in honour of our former colleague, the Hon. Ken Dryden.

[A moment of silence observed]

Hon. Ken DrydenOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Nepean Ontario

Liberal

Mark Carney LiberalPrime Minister

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honour a national hero and a personal idol. Earlier this month, we lost the Hon. Ken Dryden. Ken's story is profoundly Canadian. He was born in Hamilton, grew up in Islington and was the son of a builder and kindergarten teacher. He joined the Islington Hornets in Toronto as a goaltender at the age of seven.

He entered the NHL as a player for the Montreal Canadiens 16 years later.

Ken was the reason I became a goalie, although I never mastered his ability to lean on his stick or to keep the puck out of the net. Ken Dryden was a six-time Stanley Cup champion and five-time Vezina Trophy winner, and he was the only person, and I say this with confidence, who will ever win the Conn Smythe Trophy for most valuable player in the playoffs before they have won the Calder Memorial Trophy as rookie of the year.

When Ken Dryden entered the NHL, he was already pursuing a law degree at McGill. His former teammates were in awe of Ken's work ethic, bringing textbooks into the dressing room and going to lectures after practice. Exam time and the playoffs overlapped, and in the spring of 1973, a few weeks after winning his second Stanley Cup, he graduated from McGill.

I remember. I was eight years old, and Ken was at the top of his game. He had put his hockey career on hold to go to school and write his bar exams. After he was called to the bar, he won the Stanley Cup another four times.

Few players retire from the National Hockey League to become lawyers, writers, politicians and public servants. After hanging up his skates, Ken dedicated his life to public service. That is why Ken was unique. He dreamed big dreams and pursued them with the kind of focus and determination that served him well.

Some of my dear colleagues here today had the privilege of serving alongside Ken. As a member of Parliament, he served the people of York Centre for seven years. His leadership and dedication to advocating for affordable child care paved the way for future leaders, such as the member for University—Rosedale, to finally institute the system available to families today.

Yes, Ken Dryden believed in solidarity, and that is something we all owe to one another.

Ken Dryden challenged us to dream big and to be bold for our future. As parliamentarians and as Canadians, let us work toward that future with Ken's values of hard work, solidarity and ambition. Few Canadians have given more or stood taller for our country. Ken Dryden was big Canada. Ken Dryden was best Canada.

My deepest condolences to Ken's wife, Lynda, and their two children, Sarah and Michael. Our thanks to them for sharing their husband and father with our country.

May we pick up Ken's torch and hold it high, and may he rest in peace.

Hon. Ken DrydenOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Conservative

John Brassard Conservative Barrie South—Innisfil, ON

Mr. Speaker, I too rise to pay tribute to a remarkable Canadian whose contributions have transcended the arenas of sport, public service and social advocacy, the Hon. Ken Dryden. I do so not just as a member of Parliament, but as a kid who grew up in Montreal watching Ken Dryden play for the Canadiens. I have a personal connection to the Dryden family by way of my wife's family, who lived not too far from Murray, Margaret, Ken, Dave and Judy's home in central Etobicoke on Pinehurst Crescent. My mother-in-law Jean Berry served on the board of Ken's dad's charity, Sleeping Children Around the World, and edited Murray's book With God Nothing is Impossible.

When Lynda and Ken moved back to Toronto, my wife Liane babysat their two children while they searched for a home. I had the occasion to visit Dryden's childhood home several times in Islington with my mother-in-law, and the home later became a warehouse of bed kits for Murray's charity. What struck me was that Murray had paved the backyard so young Ken and Dave could hone their skills in net with the neighbourhood kids, who, as I was told by Murray, would gather often to play ball hockey and ice hockey in the winter. The nets were still there when I visited. Members can imagine how I felt seeing the very spot where my hockey hero, the member for Foothills's hero and many of our Quebec colleagues' hero learned the art of being a goaler.

Dave Stubbs of NHL.com wrote that Dryden was “never a conventional goaltender. Not with his lanky, even gangly body type, accentuated even more by his stand-up style of play”. I thought about that as I stood in the Dryden backyard. In fact, his style was so unconventional that “legendary Boston Bruins and New York Rangers sniper Phil Esposito...during the 1971 Stanley Cup Playoffs was so frustrated by Dryden stoning the Bruins in an NHL Quarterfinals upset that he grumbled about the goalie having ‘arms like a giraffe.’” More than half a century later, Esposito revisited the confusing comparison to a giraffe's anatomy after Dryden's death and said, “OK, maybe [he had] the legs of a giraffe.”

Much has been said about his hockey accomplishments since his passing on September 5: the Stanley Cups he won, the Vezina Trophy, the Conn Smythe Trophy, the 1972 Summit Series and being drafted by the Boston Bruins in the 1964 NHL draft, which he did find out until the mid-seventies because it was a much simpler time back then, with no cellphones, no Internet and no hockey database websites. However, it is what he accomplished outside of playing hockey that has been so intriguing.

The legendary American broadcaster Al Michaels, who Dryden was sitting beside during the Miracle on Ice, when arguably the greatest call in sports history was made, referred to Ken recently on a podcast as a “Renaissance man” who knew everything about everything.

Father Raymond J. de Souza, in the National Post, said of Dryden, “In team sports, no one ever packed so much achievement into as few years (only eight seasons) as did Dryden—six Stanley Cups plus the 1972 Soviet series.” He said, “Only Michael Jordan was comparable, but the 1992 U.S. basketball ‘dream team’ was not nearly as important as the 1972 series.”

Surprisingly, Ken Dryden was at his best and most impressive off, not on, the ice. There are many excellent hockey players out there, but none was as skilled at analyzing the public sphere and, ultimately, at serving the public within the federal cabinet.

J. de Souza noted that Ken Dryden “spent a year...in classrooms as Ontario's youth commissioner to more fully understand the challenges of education.” He went on to say:

He moved into a middle-class home for a week to observe what life was like for a typical Toronto family in the early '90s. His novel of that experience, “The Moved and the Shaken”...[was] a reminder in public policy, in journalism, in culture, to pay attention not only to the movers and the shakers, but those whom they move and shake.

We would be wise to let that be a reminder to all of us as we contemplate the decisions we make and the impact they have on our fellow Canadians.

Like every kid growing up back when Ken Dryden was goalie for the Montreal Canadiens, he inspired countless people to play that position in the streets or on the ice, and to strike the Dryden pose when resting, blocker against stick, as immortalized by statues in Montreal and in the Hockey Hall of Fame.

As de Souza wrote this week, “What other sports figure is sculpted at rest rather than in action? It’s the sports version of Auguste Rodin's ‘The Thinker’ because Dryden was the great sportsman-thinker of his time, perhaps any time.”

There was never any doubt about the way that Ken Dryden lived his life or that he believed in miracles. A larger-than-life figure, he was curious, humble and respectful of the many people he met along his miraculous journey, including a young boy who grew up on 6th Avenue in Verdun and idolized Ken Dryden. He loved Canada and everything that Canada aspired to be.

Finally, having met his dad, Murray, on several occasions, and knowing the impact he had on so many lives around the world, I am not surprised Ken lived his life the way he did. Murray and Margaret Dryden taught Ken well, and it showed in who he was as a person and in everything he did.

On behalf of our Conservative team and our leader, with great respect and admiration for a truly remarkable Canadian, and Canadien, we send our condolences to Lynda and the entire Dryden family. May Ken rest, in his famous pose, in peace.

Hon. Ken DrydenOral Questions

September 17th, 2025 / 3:25 p.m.

Bloc

Martin Champoux Bloc Drummond, QC

Mr. Speaker, my childhood memories, like the childhood memories of hundreds of thousands of Quebecker children, are filled with winter nights on streets where the hard snow had made a perfect surface for us to play hockey. Sometimes three-on-three, sometimes four-on-four, one goalie, and two or three players on offence. There was no one on defence when we played in the street.

At that time, it did not cost an arm and a leg to play hockey. There was no need to rent a skating rink and no need for expensive equipment. It was enough to have a pompom toque, mittens, a wooden stick that was not even curved, and a head full of dreams. “Guy Lafleur picks up the puck. He is alone; he shoots—He scores!” That is what all the young boys would shout on the street—that, and the familiar and endless calls of “Car!” The goal would be shoved to the side of the road. They would wait for the car to pass, put the goal back in place and carry on. Then we heard, “Guy Lafleur takes the puck back; he is in the zone, and—Save by Ken Dryden! Ken Dryden with a spectacular save.” Every kid scoring goals on the streets of Quebec, they were all Guy Lafleurs. Every kid making saves in every neighbourhood, all the goalies, they were Ken Drydens. From Chibougamau to Venise‑en‑Québec, from Shawinigan to Drummondville, “Save by Ken Dryden!” He was the best goalie in the world. We were too when we stopped a frozen tennis ball while playing smack in the middle of the road on a January night.

He was the one who earned some of our Stanley Cups, who made the Canadiens unbeatable. Is there any more beautiful tribute to someone than to say that he was the one with whom thousands and thousands of children identify? Everyone wants to be Montreal Canadiens number 29. For anyone who loved hockey, Guy Lafleur and Ken Dryden were the ones who thrilled Quebec the most. For at least two generations of Quebeckers, Ken Dryden was the embodiment of our youth. He, like others before him and others after him, explains our passion for hockey and the importance of the Montreal Canadiens to our identity.

We offer our deepest condolences to his family, and on behalf of all fans of our national sport, we express our gratitude for the achievements he earned for us.

I would be remiss if I did not mention his public service. Elected in 2004, when the Bloc Québécois had 52 members elected, Mr. Dryden served briefly as a minister under Paul Martin before ending up on the opposition benches until 2011. He was an affable, intelligent man. He was liked by everyone, which is no small feat in today's political climate. His fight to protect young athletes from the scourge of concussions is admirable, and we have a collective responsibility to carry on his legacy.

For his work in the House, for his commitment to protecting our young athletes, for the Stanley Cups he delivered to Canadiens fans and on behalf of all young people standing in goal on a winter's night in the 1970s, allow me, on behalf of the Bloc Québécois, to simply say thank you, Mr. Dryden.

Hon. Ken DrydenOral Questions

3:25 p.m.

NDP

Leah Gazan NDP Winnipeg Centre, MB

Mr. Speaker, I would say to my hon. colleagues, friends and everyone across Canada that I know, when we hear the name Ken Dryden, as we have heard today, the first image for many is of a towering figure in the net, calm, steady, unshakable, leading the Montreal Canadiens to six Stanley Cups and earning his place in the Hockey Hall of Fame. However, Ken Dryden's greatest legacy is not measured in wins or banners, but in his tireless work to ensure that every child in this country has a chance to dream, learn and succeed.

Ken Dryden understood something fundamental, which is that greatness in sport comes and goes, but greatness in service to others is a lasting legacy. Even while he was guarding the net for the Canadiens, he was also finishing his law degree at McGill University. It is a sign of his determination, balance and foresight, which would define his life after hockey. He could have chosen an easy path of fame and comfort. Instead, he chose learning, leadership and ultimately public service. He retired, in fact, at the height of his career.

Dryden then became a writer, a teacher, eventually a member of Parliament and then the minister of social development. In that role, he championed what he has always believed, which is that the future of Canada rests in the opportunities we give to our children. Ken Dryden had a deep respect for children, who are often overlooked in places of power.

At a time when we find so many people and groups disconnected from our very own humanity, Ken Dryden reminded us always that every child matters, that every child had a right to dignity, safety and security and to be nurtured as a flower, to grow and to flourish. What inspires me time and again is that he reminded us that early childhood education was not, in fact, a luxury, but a necessity, and that child care was not a private burden, but a public responsibility. As somebody who started their career in early childhood education, that meant so very much to me and early childhood educators throughout the country.

He also understood that, if we want to build a stronger country, we must start by giving every child, no matter where they came from, a fair chance to grow, thrive and succeed. He deeply cared about the human rights of children, something that is often up for debate in political spaces.

What inspires me the most in Dryden's persistence is that he never settled for short-term fixes or political convenience. He called on governments of every stripe to think beyond election cycles and to think about generations. His questions were always about what kind of country we wanted to leave our children. We need to learn from his example. We need to work across party lines to ensure that we never lose sight of ensuring that children in Canada are given everything they need to thrive and are provided with everything they need to live in dignity and flourish as the delicate flowers Ken Dryden was able to see in all children.

Reflecting on this, I know that, through listening to Ken Dryden and seeing what he did, he pushed all of us to see education as not simply reading and arithmetic, but as the very foundation of citizenship. A strong education system does not produce workers. He reminded us that it produces good leaders, dreamers and citizens with compassion and courage. As somebody who comes from the field of education, we often lose sight of how to build a good country. It goes beyond the pocketbook. It is about ensuring the well-being of all people.

Today, as we reflect on Ken Dryden's legacy, we are reminded that true leadership is not about the applause we receive in the arena, but about the lives we lift up in our communities. His commitment to children and education has touched countless families. His vision continues to challenge us to be better, to do more and to dream bigger to ensure that the next generations are better off than the ones before.

Let us honour Ken Dryden not only with our words but also with our actions. Let us carry forward his fight for universal child care, for stronger schools, for policies that put children at the very heart of every decision we make, whether in Canada or across the world. In the end, the most fitting tribute we can offer Ken Dryden is through our very own actions.

On behalf of the NDP, I offer condolences to his wife Lynda, his children Sarah and Michael, the rest of his family members and all those whose lives he touched.

Hon. Ken DrydenOral Questions

3:35 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Mr. Speaker, it is a great honour to have a chance to add my words to those of my colleagues on the passing of a remarkable Canadian whom I was very, very lucky to know. Obviously I did not get to know him because I play hockey. I did not get to know him in courtrooms, although I was a practising lawyer. I got to know him before I was involved in partisan politics, while I was working with other women leaders and other people in civil society working for child care when Ken Dryden was minister of social development.

I will not take all my time, because so many good words have been said of the way in which he inspired youth, the way in which he championed important causes, and the remarkable achievement of being a successful NHL player while also, as my friend from Winnipeg Centre said so eloquently, making sure his education was completed. Although many people will debate whether choosing the practice of law was a good choice, I endorse it myself. Because Ken Dryden had such a keen mind and a heart for public service, he did so much for this country and for women.

Let me share what I remember. I remember Ken Dryden's working ceaselessly to get signed agreements with each of the 10 provinces in this country to guarantee that we would have affordable early education and child care for every Canadian child. I remember working with Martha Friendly, who founded the University of Toronto's Childcare Resource and Research Unit, and her tireless work with then minister Dryden.

It is Martha I want to quote now. I never heard Ken Dryden say these words, but Martha said she will never forget Ken Dryden saying, as he started on this mission, “We need to get the system so in place that we’re painted into a corner and it can’t ever be removed.” Unfortunately that did not occur. He created a universal child care program, and it obviously set a benchmark. It set the stage, and we still have work to do, because every child in Canada deserves the best start in life and deserves high quality early education and child care, and every parent needs to know that when they drop their child off at child care, it is affordable and they are not choosing between their rent and child care.

Let me close with Ken Dryden's own words. When he achieved this for Canadians, the selfless, hard work in a very partisan and difficult place, Ken Dryden described himself as “the luckiest guy in government” because he was given a tough job to achieve something meaningful. I would ask all of us to reflect on that. When will we feel we have accomplished something that makes us feel we are the luckiest person in Parliament because we were given an impossible task and we accomplished it?

His family, Lynda, Sarah, Michael and his grandchildren, has our deepest sympathy and gratitude for sharing a remarkable human being, a truly decent human being of remarkable talent and skill, who gave his life, his dedication and service to inspiring Canadians, not just when he served in this place but also with the legacy he left for us to achieve and deliver on the promises he started so brilliantly to deliver.

Hon. Ken DrydenOral Questions

3:40 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

Hon. colleagues, thank you very much for your words in tribute to our friend and colleague, the Hon. Ken Dryden. As you said, we owe a great deal to our former colleague for the great moments he gave us on the ice, in his writings and right here in the House of Commons.

He was a man for all seasons, who contributed to this country and its identity in so many profound ways. As a hockey hero, lawyer, author of books exploring Canada's soul, politician, thinker, professor and, as so many of us here today know, as a gentleman. We are grateful for all the great moments he gave us, moments etched in our individual memories and collective consciousness.

He was a true Canadian hero, one of the greats, a model of integrity and humility, and a man who pursued excellence in a variety of areas. I will always remember when he arrived on the scene in the middle of the playoffs in March 1971, when Montreal and its team had run out of hope in the quarter-finals against the champions, the Bruins. It was a true baptism of fire for a young man with no NHL experience, whom we had never heard of, but who took us to the cup.

His career as a hockey player had so many dramatic moments, and yet as a person, he eschewed drama for civility. I recall reading that one time the fiery Johnny McKenzie, of what were then called the Big Bad Bruins, crowded in front of the net and ran into Ken's stick. McKenzie was ready to answer with a well-placed punch, only to hear Ken calmly say, “Excuse me.” McKenzie later said, “How could I get mad at a nice [guy who says sorry]?” It is as much a story about Ken Dryden as it is about the power of civility. Hockey and saying sorry, it does not get much more Canadian than that.

As a colleague, I saw him stay at an event well beyond what was expected because he would grant every last person time to share their Ken Dryden story, a moment that meant something to them during a game they saw in person or on TV.

Like with most heroes, there are many stories about Ken Dryden that help us better understand his impact and his contribution to his country. His arrival in my hometown of Montreal in the 1970s was momentous, even magical.

The fortunes of the Canadiens changes when the lanky Cornell-educated player from Toronto arrived in net.

I think Ken's time in Montreal also helped him, given his boundless curiosity, to more fully explore this country's passion for hockey and to discover some sense of Canada's soul and a love for the French language.

Here, in the House, Ken Dryden was always well spoken, always calm under pressure, just as he was on the ice, always listening and always wanting to do more for his country.

He was an inspiration to us and to all Canadians, some of whom immortalized him in works of art and even in a play.

After his death, a letter writer to a national newspaper said that if ever we are unsure of what to do, we should ask ourselves, “What would Ken Dryden do?”

These are wise words in tribute to a very wise man.

We offer our condolences to his family and hope that his extraordinary legacy will be a source of comfort and pride.

Thank you.

Hon. John McCallumOral Questions

3:45 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

Pursuant to order made on Tuesday, September 16, 2025, I invite all hon. members to stand to observe a moment of silence in honour of our former colleague, the Hon. John McCallum.

[A moment of silence observed]

Hon. John McCallumOral Questions

3:45 p.m.

Beauséjour New Brunswick

Liberal

Dominic LeBlanc LiberalPresident of the King’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister responsible for Canada-U.S. Trade

Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to rise today on behalf of the government and my Liberal caucus colleagues to pay tribute to the life of one of our former colleagues, someone you also knew well, Mr. Speaker, and one of my best friends, the late Hon. John McCallum, whose kindness, generosity and incredible sense of humour touched everyone who had the pleasure of knowing him.

I will provide a brief overview of his long and distinguished career.

Before entering politics, John was known as one of Canada's top economists. He started his academic career in western Canada, at the University of Manitoba, before becoming dean of the faculty of arts at McGill University, where he was at the forefront of the national unity debates that were on Canadians' minds at the time.

In 1994, he left university life for the private sector where he held the position of senior vice-president and chief economist at the Royal Bank of Canada. That is where he forged a reputation as a very well-respected economist who could explain major economic trends in simple terms for the average person, a quality that helped me a great deal throughout our friendship.

After more than half a decade at RBC, John decided in 2000 to enter public life, and he was elected in the riding of Markham—Thornhill. That was when I met John for the first time. As luck would have it, we were sitting next to each other on that very first day in the House of Commons almost 25 years ago. From there on, we quickly became friends, finding common interests, not just in political matters but in family holidays together, on fishing trips in New Brunswick and family holidays abroad as well.

I will forever cherish those memories, and seeing John's wife, Nancy, and their children on Parliament Hill today reminded me of those happy moments.

John became minister in January 2002, and later I had the opportunity to serve as his parliamentary secretary at National Defence, the highlight of what was then my first term in the House of Commons. In those early years, in addition to his ministerial responsibilities, John made a name for himself as a courageous and outspoken advocate on pivotal issues that helped shape Canada into a more open, tolerant and welcoming society.

In June 2001, as a backbencher, he introduced a motion in the House of Commons to nominate Nelson Mandela as an honorary citizen of Canada, making Canada the first country to extend such an honour to this iconic champion of equality and human rights.

Fast-forward to 2015, when, building on his ability to leverage Canada's global reputation as a compassionate and progressive nation, John, as the newly appointed minister of immigration, refugees and citizenship, spearheaded Canada's efforts to resettle more than 40,000 Syrian refugees in record time.

The scale of the task cannot be overstated. It required mobilizing considerable government, local, private sector and community resources, and John poured his heart and soul into this noble effort. His success was our nation's success, and all of us can be proud of the way Canadians opened their homes and their hearts, as they have time and time again over the course of history, to those people fleeing war and persecution. John McCallum led that effort brilliantly. John embodied those values and led those debates.

Throughout his career, he served Canadians with intelligence, dedication and kindness.

I would like to offer our sincerest condolences to his beloved wife, Nancy, and to their three boys, Andrew, Jamie and Duncan. May they find comfort in knowing the profound impact their husband and their father had on our country and his numerous friends and colleagues, myself included. His legacy will live on here in the House of Commons, in his community and in the lives of the thousands of people whom he helped to find hope and solace.

Rest in peace, my friend. Thank you for your friendship and remarkable service to our country.

Hon. John McCallumOral Questions

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB

Mr. Speaker, I rise to pay tribute to John McCallum, a long-serving member of Parliament and cabinet minister.

My Liberal colleague just outlined John's long and accomplished career in economics and finance, and he certainly brought that knowledge and skill set to his role in this place.

I first met John when I was elected in 2011. I was young and somewhat naive, if members can believe that, but John was always kind to me, and that is something that one remembers in this place.

There is a line in the Fleetwood Mac song Landslide that of late, given my advancing age, has recently started to punch me in the gut:

Time makes you bolder
Even children get older
And I'm gettin' older, too

It is hard to believe that nearly nine years have passed since I last rose in this place to pay tribute to John, who at that point had announced his retirement as a member of Parliament after a long and successful career. At the time, I noted that I was not delivering a eulogy, so finding myself doing so today is a reminder of one of the things John used to say when we routinely chatted: “Time passes quickly here, so make each day count.” That is wisdom from John that we should all take in our roles.

At the time, John was the immigration minister and I was the immigration critic. I guess some things never change, John. After John retired, I realized that he had two particularly admirable qualities I think everybody in this place would do well to emulate. The first was his remarkable sense of humour. I have to say, John, if you are listening, that I deeply enjoyed sparring with you. John's wit and cleverness were eclipsed only by his gregariousness and his very good sense of humour.

For example, John and I once had a rather famous sparring match in the House, wherein he implied that I should smile more. I raised the issue in a point of order, and he apologized. After the interaction, he came up to me and genuinely apologized, albeit with that signature twinkle in his eye. If anyone knew him, they knew this: There was always this little twinkle in John's eye. Feeling bold, I accepted his apology with a flourish, saying, “Thank you, Emperor Palpatine.” John paused for a moment; he roared with laughter, and he encouraged me to embrace the dark side. In that instant, all was well.

That sense of humour is something that served John so well in this place, where the three-sword-length distance between the government and opposition benches can feel rather short on some days. He was always known across the aisle for his good humour, and that is something he will be remembered for. I find myself sometimes chuckling about things he would say to me, especially coming back into this role.

The other admirable quality that I will remember about John was that as a minister, he respected the role of the opposition. In my experience with John, I found that he understood that in this place, and in order for democracy to work, he could not ignore his opposition critic. When we disagreed, I found that he still respected the work I had put into the file. When we sparred, he would usually take the time to tell me that he had thought about what he had brought up and would try to explain to me his position and why he felt it was more important. Oftentimes, he did try to consider where I was going, and on more than one occasion we actually managed to find common ground.

He would be honest with me. He was very upfront about what he thought he could get through his caucus or where he thought I needed to bend in order to find compromise. Sometimes we found compromise and sometimes we did not, but at the end of the day, I trusted John because I knew he was coming at his work from a sense of trying to respect our democratic institutions and from a place of love and support for the people in his community. I have to say that I have sorely missed that dynamic since John left. I was spoiled as an opposition critic. I will always respect him for that.

A few years ago, John and I found ourselves accidentally seated beside each other on a plane. It was funny; people were walking down the aisle and saw us seated together, and they were like, “Uh-oh”, but it was one of the best plane rides I have ever had. Many of the members share what we shared, as we are on a plane quite often. He was extremely wistful and imparted some sage words of advice. I remember this: He said, “Our lives are short. Make each day count. Spend less time on a plane and more time with your family, Michelle.” It is advice that is hard to internalize in this place. Certainly, I still struggle with it every day, but it underscores that life in public service cannot be walked alone.

My deepest condolences go to Nancy, Andrew, Jamie and Duncan, and to their families, for a loss that I think a lot of people across the country felt.

I also extend my gratitude to John's family for their support to John throughout his time in public office.

John, may you rest in peace.

Hon. John McCallumOral Questions

3:55 p.m.

Bloc

Claude DeBellefeuille Bloc Beauharnois—Salaberry—Soulanges—Huntingdon, QC

Mr. Speaker, on June 21, at the beginning of the summer break, the House lost a seasoned parliamentarian, an influential minister, an economist, a renowned academic and a diplomat, when John McCallum passed away at the age of 75.

Mr. McCallum was a pillar of the Liberal Party who served under three prime ministers: Jean Chrétien, Paul Martin and Justin Trudeau. He left an indelible mark on the recent history of federal politics.

He first made his mark in his hometown of Montreal as a professor at UQAM and then as the dean of the faculty of arts at McGill University. Following an academic career of nearly 20 years, during which he made a name for himself in the field of commerce, Mr. McCallum put his expertise to the test as the chief economist for the Royal Bank of Canada in 1994.

Then, politics called. With the support of Jean Chrétien, John McCallum was elected to the House of Commons in 2000 as the member for Markham, a northern suburb of Toronto. Two years later, Jean Chrétien appointed him as defence minister. A new prime minister, Paul Martin, appointed him to serve as veterans affairs minister in 2003 and revenue minister in 2004, a position he held until the Liberals were defeated in 2006.

This was followed by an extended period in the opposition, during which Mr. McCallum did his duty as one of the key critics for his political party.

Nearly a decade later, he returned to Cabinet as the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship, this time under Justin Trudeau. It must have been he ultimate irony to return to Cabinet at the request of a new boss who was just a student at McGill when Mr. McCallum was a dean there.

John McCallum retired from politics in 2017 to become Canada's ambassador to China, a position he held until 2019, when he became a strategic adviser in the private sector.

As the Bloc Québécois representative, I admit it would be an understatement to say we had major political differences with Mr. McCallum. He was strongly opposed to Quebec's sovereignty, his contribution to the public debate on the economics of Quebec's separation raised many eyebrows. Although we often found ourselves on opposing sides during the biggest political battle in the history of Quebec and Canada, we remember Mr. McCallum today as a smiling, affable intellectual, who spoke frankly, had a great sense of humour and also a sense of statesmanship.

On behalf of the Bloc Québécois, I want to offer my condolences to his wife, Nancy, his three sons, his six grandchildren, his loved ones and the Liberal political family.

Thank you for your public service, Mr. McCallum.